>>146 sure, but they still have a better morality code than atheists. t. atheist

>>154 There is no "morality code" for atheism, idiot

you just proved his point

>>154 >>159 >>164 No because atheists act morals out of the good of their own heart while religious people need their religion to tell them to be moral

>>169 This argument is hair thin. Everybody has morality. The difference is that people who go to church have a community which can shield them from the eroding effects of evil in the world. So that they have the strength and stamina to continually be more moral than others. While on the other hand, besides regular people who just temporarily consider themselves agnostic or atheist, we may consider the race who is vehemently genetically atheistic, the jew. The jew is the anti-christ because he does not know god. As a purely material entity, they don't have souls. They are like walking robot androids. They are creations of satan. They are NOT people. They have NO sense of morality at all. All evil in the world can be traced back to a jew.

>>171 I’m sure you know a lot about morality, coming to this site…

>>172 yes

>>169 Someone who doesn't follow a moral code out of the goodness of their heart is not religious. And people who subscribe to only one religion are not religious either. They're just ideologs.

Is vs ought Anyone without Christianity will never be able to arrive at the ought. They can tell you how something is, but never ought.